WASHINGTON, June 2, 2015 – When commodity prices were hitting record highs a couple of years ago, farm bill critics often made the case that it was finally time to make deep spending cuts or eliminate farm subsidies altogether.

Yet, several members of the House and Senate Agriculture Committees had a frequent refrain: “You don’t write a farm bill for the good times; you write a farm bill for the bad times that will invariably come.”

In many ways, that time seems to have arrived. Members of the Agriculture Subcommittee on General Farm Commodities and Risk Management devoted a hearing this morning to documenting the changes taking place across a wide variety of operations.

“Farm prices for many crops have dropped dramatically since the farm bill debate. Inputs costs continue to rise.  Mother Nature continues to wreak havoc on some regions of the country. Foreign competitors are sharply increasing their subsidies, tariffs, and non-tariff trade barriers,” noted Subcommittee Chair Rick Crawford, R-Ark., in his opening statement. “The EPA is pushing new and costly regulations. Some in this country are standing in the way of critical tax relief, ranging from a permanent section 179 and bonus depreciation to repeal of the death tax.”

In general, panelists agreed with Crawford and Ranking Member Tim Walz, D-Minn., that many sectors of agriculture are in a tough spot. Net farm income in 2015 is projected to be about 43 percent less than the record high $129 billion set in 2013.

Witnesses from left to right, Nathan Kauffman, Paul Combs, Steve Varett, Dow Brantley, Kevin Paap

New programs under the Agricultural Act of 2014, the farm bill, are expected to lead to a 15 percent increase ($1.6 billion) in government payments and fill part of that slack. At $12.4 billion, 2015’s expected payments would be the largest since 2010, USDA reported earlier this year.

Steve Varett, who grows cotton, sorghum and wheat on farms east of Lubbock, Texas, described the current financial health of the farm economy in one word: Precarious.

“Lenders in my part of thcountrtell me thaas mucas 65 percent of operating loans from last year had significant carryover into 2015 because producers simplcould not pay off their notes. Equipment dealers tell me thaabout half of producers in our area had to have their equipment notes restructured. Bankers pulled a rabbit out of the hat in getting a great majority of producers in our part of the countrrefinancefor 2015 in a time when it is very difficult to show a positive cash flow,” he noted.

Nathan Kauffman, assistant vicpresident, economist, and Omaha Branch executive, FederaReserve Bank of KansaCity, told the subcommittee that the farm income drop is mainly due to lower prices of major U.S. row crops, combined with “persistently high” production costs.

“For examplecorn priceare currentlabout 50 percent less than in 2013 and soybean prices have dropped more than 30 percent over the same time frame. Despite the lower commoditprices, input costs have remainerelatively high, causing profit margins to weaken notably over the past two years,” he said, adding that farmland prices have softened or declined in many areas.

But the farm economic downturn is not consistent across all commodities or all regions and many farmers have managed more conservatively than in the past.

Kevin Paap, president of the Minnesota Farm Bureau Federation and a corn and soybean producer in Blue Earth County, summed up the financial health of farm country in two words: “It depends.”

He noted that crop farmers faced steep price declines with high input costs while livestock producers saw 2014 as one of the best years ever.” His home state – which prides itself on being the nation’s top turkey producer- has been particularly hard hit by avian influenza, which has resulted in the death of 8 million birds and resulting and an estimated $113.6 million in losses.

“Financial stress – it’s here, it’s real and it’s challenging for many,” emphasized Paap. He said farmers are restructuring their debt to stretch out capital payments and more producers are turning to USDA’s Farm Service Agency for loans.

Several witnesses testified about how the economic downturn on the farm is starting to have a ripple effect throughout other parts of rural America. Paul Combs, who farms in Missouri’s southern Boot Hill region and operates 11 equipment dealerships in Missouri and Arkansas, said his equipment sales are down 15 percent year over year.