WASHINGTON, Jan. 11, 2017 - A change
in House budgetary rules could make it easier for states or local governments
to gain control of federal lands. The new rule, pushed by Natural Resources
Chairman Rob Bishop, would mean that
transfers of federal lands to local and state governments would no longer
require a spending or revenue offset to account for the value of the acreage.
The rule change has come under sharp
criticism from conservation groups who want to keep public lands in federal
hands. But the rule doesn’t apply to Senate procedures, and any House-passed
transfer bills would still have to pass the Senate, where Republicans hold a
narrow 52-48 majority.
“Why are we binding ourselves on a
simple accounting technique? It’s stupid,” Bishop, R-Utah, said of the old rule
that required budget offsets. “Take the accounting techniques out of the
evaluation. Let Congress make the
policy based on what is the good policy, without being held up by some
ineffective and arcane accounting technique.”
Another concern of conservationists is
that financially strapped state or local governments would sell off the land
once it’s in their hands. Bishop say that’s easy to prevent by writing
restrictions into the transfer legislation.
A wild card
is Trump’s nominee for Interior, Rep. Ryan Zinke. The Montana Republican has opposed federal land transfers but voted for the rules
package last week. President-elect Donald Trump also has made differing
statements on the issue.
Still, Bishop thinks the House rules
change is a significant step forward. “We’ll make policy decisions based on
policy objectives, not necessarily trying to find the offset that we have to do
this to satisfy an unfair rule.” Could a land transfer get enacted? “Yeah. Will
it definitely? Not necessarily,” he said. “It’s still got to go to Congress. Congress has to decide they have to do
those kinds of exchanges.”
Another rule change approved by the
House could allow lawmakers to force votes to cut specific agencies or even
specific government employees. It reinstates for one year what is known as the
Holman rule. House Majority Leader Kevin McCarthy calls the rule change a
“pilot program,” since it’s scheduled to expire in one year. House
Agriculture Chairman Mike Conaway, R-Texas, says he isn’t convinced that the
rule is needed but says it will be allowed to expire if it’s abused.
#30
